![]() ![]() Over hundreds of thousands of hands, the differential amounts to as much as $30 million a year for the casino operators.Ī state judge sided with the casinos in one of the cases below, and in the other a federal judge sided with the gamblers. On a $20 bet, that’s the difference between winning $24 versus $30. The lawsuits claimed that many players were unknowingly steered into a variant where they got only 6:5 for a blackjack - an ace along with a 10 or face card - instead of the traditional 3:2 payout. “They should have quit while they were ahead.” “Therefore, the plaintiffs lose this last bet,” Justice Scott Kafker wrote for the unanimous court, in a 31-page ruling rife with double entendres. BOSTON (CN) - Massachusetts casinos did not break the law in paying only 6:5 odds for blackjack, rather than the more standard 3:2 odds, the state’s high court ruled Wednesday, resolving two enormous class actions.Īlthough the court said the rules of blackjack as written by the state’s gaming commission were “garbled” and impossible to understand, it deferred to the commission's determination that what the casinos did was OK. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |